Cellophane wrappers for newly published titles
New Naturalists
Forum home       Members    Calendar    Who's On
Welcome Guest
        


12»»

Cellophane wrappers for newly published... Expand / Collapse
Author
Message
Posted 24 February 2010
Supreme Being

Supreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 23 October 2011
Posts: 173, Visits: 1,547
A simple question for Collins...why?!

In my opinion, they actually damage the books, certainly the Dust Jackets of the books (which if they overhang even slightly, which they normally do on one edge, are always curled), rather than protect them.

I genuinely can't understand what purpose they serve (or you think they serve)?

Didn't publishers used to wrap titles (say 5 or 10 depending on the size of the book) in paper? I suppose this is progress (oh dear, I've just turned into my father).

They are also a pain in the rear end because you can never tell what you are buying (or wanting to sell)!

Don't like 'em. There, I feel better now :-)
Post #494
Posted 26 February 2010
Supreme Being

Supreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 04 February 2012
Posts: 125, Visits: 1,113
Hengus (24/02/2010)
A simple question for Collins...why?!

In my opinion, they actually damage the books, certainly the Dust Jackets of the books (which if they overhang even slightly, which they normally do on one edge, are always curled), rather than protect them.

I genuinely can't understand what purpose they serve (or you think they serve)?

Didn't publishers used to wrap titles (say 5 or 10 depending on the size of the book) in paper? I suppose this is progress (oh dear, I've just turned into my father).

They are also a pain in the rear end because you can never tell what you are buying (or wanting to sell)!

Don't like 'em. There, I feel better now :-)

Interesting thought............................If all these faulty N/N's 112 are sealed with this thin cellophane then how can a dealer/seller of these books tell that all of their stock have these roller marks on those two pages if every book is sealed by the manufacturer in cellophane? I'm not fussed about having the cellophane on my brand new book as long as my 1st edition arrives in mint condition! It's only more oil based waste that will mostly end up in landfill!

Cheers,

Lee.

Post #509
Posted 21 March 2010
Forum Newbie

Forum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum Newbie

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 25 March 2010
Posts: 7, Visits: 16
I also have a dislike of the cellophane wrapper which in my opinion causes creasing of the jacket at the head and tail of the spine.

Andy

Post #569
Posted 20 April 2010
Forum Newbie

Forum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum NewbieForum Newbie

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 31 August 2011
Posts: 1, Visits: 100
Sorry that my first post has to be a gripe - I'm normally just a very interested reader.  However just received signed Ian Newton's Migration. Book in great condition but wrapper creased top and bottom possibly by the cellophane shrink-wrapping process.  Not even "Fine" let alone "Mint".  So will be returning for replacement.  An avoidable waste of time, effort and expense.
Post #616
Posted 20 April 2010
Supreme Being

Supreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme Being

Group: Administrators
Last Login: 08 December 2011
Posts: 110, Visits: 707
Hi Sirem sorry to hear about this please email newnaturalists@harpercollins.co.uk with details.

Thanks

Alex
Collins

Post #617
Posted 06 May 2010
Supreme Being

Supreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme Being

Group: Administrators
Last Login: 08 December 2011
Posts: 110, Visits: 707
Quick update on why the books are shrinkwrapped - if they were not the jackets would be smudged and grubby. It was in fact due to requests from NN collectors that they were shrinkwrapped in protective cellophane, so looks like we have come full circle!

Alex
Collins

Post #639
Posted 06 May 2010
Supreme Being

Supreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 23 October 2011
Posts: 173, Visits: 1,547
Collins (06/05/2010)
Quick update on why the books are shrinkwrapped - if they were not the jacketswould be smudged and grubby. It was in fact due to requests from NN collectors that they were shrinkwrapped in protective cellophane, so looks like we have come full circle!

Alex
Collins


So how come all sorts of other books of a similar dimension, many made by Harper Collins, are sent to book shops and posted without cellophane wrappers and arrive in perfect condition without appearing smudged and grubby.

The argument is not with the cellophane wrappers per se, is it...its quite simply that this method used to seal these books does damage them. Its a fact. IF copies were being sent out smudged and grubby before and this is the solution, the obvious conclusion is that this solution creates a problem equally as bad, so another solution is needed. But personally, I never had a smudged, grubby edition prior to the wrappers being introduced.

What about the paper wrappers that go around the leatherbound volumes? Couldn't they do the job?

In the 'good old days', books were individually wrapped in thickish paper before being boxed. Some smaller printing houses still do that.

Post #640
Posted 06 May 2010
Supreme Being

Supreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 04 February 2012
Posts: 125, Visits: 1,113
Collins (06/05/2010)
Quick update on why the books are shrinkwrapped - if they were not the jackets would be smudged and grubby. It was in fact due to requests from NN collectors that they were shrinkwrapped in protective cellophane, so looks like we have come full circle!

Alex
Collins

 

Smudged & Grubby?? If handled in a clean & precise way & assuming the Dust-jackets are of decent quality the surely this shouldn't be the case would it? I have not incurred damaged D/J's due to the cellophane but it does need removing with some care to avoid causing damage to the dust-jacket by doing so!

By the way, this posting of mine is the 500th since the new forum was created by our friends at Collins. Thanks to all!

Lee.

Post #641
Posted 07 May 2010
Supreme Being

Supreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme BeingSupreme Being

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 23 October 2011
Posts: 173, Visits: 1,547


By the way, this posting of mine is the 500th since the new forum was created by our friends at Collins. Thanks to all!

Lee.


Why does it say Post 641, then?
Post #642
Posted 07 May 2010
Forum Member

Forum MemberForum MemberForum MemberForum MemberForum MemberForum MemberForum MemberForum Member

Group: Forum Members
Last Login: 02 February 2011
Posts: 28, Visits: 431
I've got some sympathy for Collins on this one - perhaps it's more of an issue for the copies that make it through to retail? I can definitely imagine a copy in a bookshop getting pretty tatty with just a bit of handling - the matt dustjackets are definitely less fingerprint-proof than most books, and the people who would actually buy the books are probably fussier than the average reader! Perhaps the solution would be to put mail order copies in paper wrapper or envelope inside the box, and have cellophane wrapped copies sent out to booksellers?
Post #643
« Prev Topic | Next Topic »

12»»

Reading This Topic Expand / Collapse
Active Users: 0 (0 guests, 0 members, 0 anonymous members)
No members currently viewing this topic.
Forum Moderators: Admin

Permissions Expand / Collapse

All times are GMT, Time now is 11:34pm